Re: AW: JERI vs. JRMP performance penalties

Cornelius, Martin (DWBI) wrote:
> Hi Mark, thanks again for answering my questions.
> 
>> I can think of has to do with the inbound, outbound ration which is set
>> to a default of 32 KB, but here I start really guessing.
>>
>> for an explanation of the inbound, outbound ration see
>> http://java.sun.com/products/jini/2.1/doc/api/net/jini/jeri/connection/doc
>> -files/mux.html
> 
> Having read that documentation, i now understand better why
> performance of JERI for 'big buffer' transfers deviates from simple JRMP
> significantly, as JERI in turn offers significant enhancements in case
> of multiple concurrent connections. Once i get time for that, i'll try
> to investigate if increasing of the 'rations' will help to improve
> performance in this special case.

If you have the time let us know the outcome (also the GC logging),
still interesting though if those responsible for both Jini ERI and JRMP
can shed a light on this matter from a theoretical point of view.
-- 
Mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting Started:     http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started
Community Web Site:  http://jini.org
jini-users Archive:  http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html
Unsubscribing:       email "signoff JINI-USERS"  to [email protected]