Re: Relieving some ClassLoader contention in PreferredClassProvider

Gregg Wonderly <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.sun.jini
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mark Brouwer wrote:
> Bob Scheifler wrote:
>
>>> If the type java.net.URL was meant I would have expected a
>>> monospaced font in the specification as is common throughout all the
>>> Jini specs.
>>
>>
>> In the first instance of the phrase "where each URL is parsed as with the
>> URL(String) constructor", the constructor form is @link'ed to
>> java.net.URL,
>> so the meaning to me is quite clear.  I think you're groping for a
>> loophole.
>
> Could you also explain why the current specified behavior is as it is?
...
> Yours blindly looking in the dark,

Yes, and I'd like to know as well, what specific behavior of equals or hashcode
is being depended on so that I don't break it, or might be able to understand
the problems that I am experiencing better.

Gregg Wonderly

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting Started:     http://www.jini.org/wiki/Category:Getting_Started
Community Web Site:  http://jini.org
jini-users Archive:  http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/jini-users.html
Unsubscribing:       email "signoff JINI-USERS"  to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.