Re: Replacing JRMP with JERI

Robert DiFalco wrote:
> Before I go too far down this path, does the NIO implementation of JERI
> solve the C10K problem or does it still use a thread per socket?

I don't know what the C10K problem is.  No matter what the JERI NIO implementation does, I think that the JERI stack
will probably allow you to implement exactly the solution you need by implementing your own endpoint.

Gregg Wonderly

===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] and include in the body
of the message "signoff RMI-USERS".  For general help, send email to
[email protected] and include in the body of the message "help".

For a list of frequently asked RMI questions please refer to:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/rmi/faq.html

To view past RMI-USERS postings, please see:
http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/rmi-users.html