[Bug 89] VMStackWalker

http://sablevm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=89

[email protected] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |critical
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



------- Additional Comments From [email protected]  2005-01-16 00:42 -------
The StackWalker should skip all the frames that belong to the reflection
that called Class.forName.  Actually this  principle) is even mentioned
in StackWalker java source file.

The current native for VMStackWalker is an improved version based on merged
code of 3 distinct functions we used to have that in principle did exactly
that job, but it clearly is not good enough for this kind of usage anymore.

I think though, that we should first get the VMStackWalkek fixed so that
SableVM worked in interpreter mode, then make sure SableJIT works as well.

Note that VMStackWalker also has two "optimized" methods that should be 
implemented natively because of better performance they will achieve.
These two are not yet implemented at all.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.