[Bug 89] VMStackWalker

http://sablevm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=89





------- Additional Comments From [email protected]  2005-01-16 14:23 -------
"The StackWalker should skip all the frames that belong to the reflection
that called Class.forName.  Actually this  principle) is even mentioned
in StackWalker java source file."

Actually, by thinking about it and with the reply of Archie to my class loading
question sent to the devs list, skipping additional frames is not the correct
solution *in this specific case*.  I will shortly attach the proposed patch that
fixes it.  I will check it to staging later today.

However, there might be some cases elsewhere that would require to add
additional skipping of frames.  This would be something to check.

"Note that VMStackWalker also has two "optimized" methods that should be 
implemented natively because of better performance they will achieve.
These two are not yet implemented at all."

yes.  It should be easy to do.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.