Re: update

> If darcs takes this much time in general use <asbestos>wouldn't arch (or
> even CVS) have been better</asbestos>. I would the the whole point for a
> revision management system was that it would save, not bring grief. I
> think the fact that it says inter-version incompatibilities 'might' exist
> before 1.0 pretty much says "don't use until at least 1.0".

I've mentioned this in #ibex a few times myself, after darcs ate my 
repository and wouldn't let me update.  Not being overly active in the 
development, though, I didn't push all that hard.  :-)

Regards,
Andrew