Re: update
Charles Goodwin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.core |
|---|---|
| Organization | XWT Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 04:38, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > If darcs takes this much time in general use <asbestos>wouldn't arch (or > even CVS) have been better</asbestos>. I would the the whole point for a > revision management system was that it would save, not bring grief. I > think the fact that it says inter-version incompatibilities 'might' exist > before 1.0 pretty much says "don't use until at least 1.0". He's just pushing for a couple of features that would really be useful. Tupshin's email was a little unfair, Adam has only posted 6 or 7 emails in March on the Darcs list. And I do think Darcs was the right choice. It's meant Tupshin and myself have been able to keep our own repos. Darcs is close to reaching that elusive 1.0 status, and once it does we'll have few (if any) problems with it. -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Online @ http://www.charlietech.com