Re: more precise formulation
Adam Megacz <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Apr 2004 02:55:04 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.core |
|---|---|
| Organization | XWT |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Also, even if we don't go with LP in the end, using it now will make it easier to play with different constraining policies until we find one that's intuitive. - a Tupshin Harper <[email protected]> writes: > Adam Megacz wrote: > >>Note that all the problems above are what are called "linear >>programming problems" [*]; there has been a lot of work on doing these >>quickly, so very fast algorithms are plentiful. >> >> > Yes, these can be expressed as linear programming problems, and yes, > plenty of work has gone into developing good algorithms to solve > linear programming problems. But don't forget that the *reason* so > much work has gone into linear programming algorithms, is because many > linear programming problems are brutishly hard., and many can't even > be solved in a realistic amount of time. I'm not saying that this > reflow problem fits into that category, but just being able to express > it as a linear programming problem doesn't make it tractable. > > -Tupshin > > _______________________________________________ > core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/core > -- "It's lucky," he added, after a pause, "that there are such a lot of islands in the world. I almost envy you, Mr. Watson." -- Mustapha Mond