Re: more precise formulation

Adam Megacz <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Apr 2004 02:55:04 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.xwt.core
Organization XWT
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Also, even if we don't go with LP in the end, using it now will make
it easier to play with different constraining policies until we find
one that's intuitive.

  - a

Tupshin Harper <[email protected]> writes:
> Adam Megacz wrote:
>
>>Note that all the problems above are what are called "linear
>>programming problems" [*]; there has been a lot of work on doing these
>>quickly, so very fast algorithms are plentiful.
>>
>>
> Yes, these can be expressed as linear programming problems, and yes,
> plenty of work has gone into developing good algorithms to solve
> linear programming problems. But don't forget that the *reason* so
> much work has gone into linear programming algorithms, is because many
> linear programming problems are brutishly hard., and many can't even
> be solved in a realistic amount of time. I'm not saying that this
> reflow problem fits into that category, but just being able to express
> it as a linear programming problem doesn't make it tractable.
>
> -Tupshin
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/core
>

-- 
"It's lucky," he added, after a pause, "that there are such a lot of
islands in the world.  I almost envy you, Mr. Watson."

                                                   -- Mustapha Mond