Re: PATCH: Bug 186

> If I can do it in one day, are you up for it?

I know we've been through this 1001 times, but I'd just like to verify a few
things.

Our model distinguishes between widgets (in standard.widgets) and
non-widgets (in standard.shared).  Are you proposing shared.focusable and
shared.lib.focusable become encapsulated in 1 or that shared.focusable goes
into .impl and shared.lib.focusable go into .lib?

The advantage of distinguishing between the two above is that it simplifies
the task of a theme designer.  They implement an xwt for everything in
xwt.standard.widgets.  Although that's a fairly minor point.  (In that a
theme designer would probably familiarise themselves with everything
anyway.)

Like I say, my personal opinion is that it's pointless reorganising it now
and should be done when the widget audit is complete.

Why not do it with our layout in our cvs until it gets to a stage that it's
a replacement for xwt widgets cvs (which will be soon) and then we can put
the 'XWT Foundation' to a test - we'll agree who are members and whom have
what weights with their votes (eg Adam might have a weight of 10, yourself,
myself 5, Andrew, Rod, Corey 3 or something equally arbitrary - btw that was
an example, not a reflection of my views on people's contributions), then
we'll have a vote on which structure to adopt then we'll all work on porting
the new working widget set / themes over to it. :)
_______________________________________________
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev