Re: PATCH: Bug 186

On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 02:55  AM, Charles Goodwin wrote:
> Our model distinguishes between widgets (in standard.widgets) and
> non-widgets (in standard.shared).  Are you proposing shared.focusable 
> and
> shared.lib.focusable become encapsulated in 1 or that shared.focusable 
> goes
> into .impl and shared.lib.focusable go into .lib?

Well focusable has always been two, because some themes need to 
reimplement the features in xwt.standard.focusable. That's why I 
separated them in the original widget library. So yes, we'd still have:

xwt.standard.impl.focusable
xwt.lib.focusable

The rest of the layout would be:

xwt.standard	 - home of the widgets
xwt.standard.impl	 - home the the backend to complex widgets and misc 
support templates
xwt.standard.menu	 - home of menu templates
xwt.lib	 - home of library code that doesn't need overriding

> Why not do it with our layout in our cvs until it gets to a stage that 
> it's
> a replacement for xwt widgets cvs (which will be soon) and then we can 
> put
> the 'XWT Foundation' to a test - we'll agree who are members and whom 
> have
> what weights with their votes

I am very much against a weighted voting system. Never, have I seen a 
weighted voting system that got the weightings right. The only way I 
can possibly see to do it is we all get one vote, and Adam holds veto.

d 


_______________________________________________
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev