Re: Organising the xwt namespace

[[ I'm suggesting that all non-instantiatable templates in xwt.widget
   end in -able ]]

Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> writes:
> eg redirectable.xwt is just wrong, redirect.xwt is accurate, the xwt

IMHO redirect belongs in xwt.lib.  Do you really want redirect.xwt to
do different things in different themes?

> Another example is selection_mux (which is due to be renamed when a better
> name is suggested).  The widget that preapplies this is part of a mutually
> exclusive selection group, not 'mutually exclusive selectable'.  (Actually,
> maybe it is, not sure on that one.)

I also think this one belongs in xwt.lib.  It shouldn't work
differently in different themes.

I'm still looking for an example of a non-instantiatable template
which varies across themes and couldn't be named with something that
ends in -able.

  - a


_______________________________________________
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev