Re: Can we agree on this and get to work?
David Crawshaw <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:13:29 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 10:05 AM, Adam Megacz wrote: > Proposal: we do http://wiki.xwt.org/Wiki.jsp?page=PNGWA minus the > theme in xwt.theme (for now), and with xwt.lib possibly subdivided in > wierd arbitrary ways, but with the caveat that we'll come back to it > later. So people should treat the internal structure of xwt.lib as > somewhat unstable for now. But xwt.widget/xwt.theme are going to get > more or less etched in stone. I'm definitely into this. But we do we all agree that the wiki is saying: xwt.widget - preapplies from - xwt.theme xwt.theme - is just a stub placeholder xwt.standard - preapplies from - xwt.lib xwt.standard - overlays - xwt.theme ? If so, this give us the two user interfaces, the single theme interface, the multi lib stuff (xwt.lib.button_functions, xwt.lib.button_layout) and no circular dependencies. d _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev