Re: FINAL CALL
Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:21:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.xwt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <308906BE5D07D5119285009027D61C5722F6BE@NTFPS1> |
A 'yes' to this and we can start moving to xwt cvs. -----Original Message----- From: Charles Goodwin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 04 April 2003 15:56 To: '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [xwt-dev] FINAL CALL > What I'd prefer is perhaps xwt.lib and xwt.lib.abstract, where xwt.lib > contains what you're thinking goes in xwt.lib.layout and xwt.lib.abstract > contains the 'functionality' pure lib only templates. What I'm saying is here that most themes should be preapplying xwt.lib to get all the common code out, and then those that just want the functionality can get it out of xwt.lib.abstract. There's no namespace distinction between widgets / non-widgets. _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev