Re: typeof

On Saturday, April 5, 2003, at 05:42  AM, Rod Martin wrote:
> Atm, typeof(somebox) simply returns 'object', which makes sense 
> because boxes
> are objects.  Is there another command I could be using, or could 
> typeof be
> overridden (is that even a word?) to implement something like this?

I asked for more introspection a long time ago, but we never formalised 
how to do it.

We need a function to test if a template has been applied to a box, at 
the very least.

You could have a function on Box called applied(templatename) that 
returns a boolean, but I suppose the word is a little too close to 
apply().

Give me a name, and I'll try and write a patch.

d


_______________________________________________
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev