Re: FINAL CALL

Sounds good to me.

Rod

On April 4, 2003 11:21 am, Charles Goodwin wrote:
> A 'yes' to this and we can start moving to xwt cvs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Goodwin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 04 April 2003 15:56
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: [xwt-dev] FINAL CALL
>
> > What I'd prefer is perhaps xwt.lib and xwt.lib.abstract, where xwt.lib
> > contains what you're thinking goes in xwt.lib.layout and xwt.lib.abstract
> > contains the 'functionality' pure lib only templates.
>
> What I'm saying is here that most themes should be preapplying xwt.lib to
> get all the common code out, and then those that just want the
> functionality can get it out of xwt.lib.abstract.  There's no namespace
> distinction between widgets / non-widgets.
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev


_______________________________________________
http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/dev