Re: Last call on the selectable naming issue

I don't think the weight would impact performance...

  - a

Rod Martin <[email protected]> writes:
> We talked about this on #xwt once and came to the conclusion that this could 
> add a lot of unnecessary weight to widgets such as check that will never use 
> the electable/muxselectable/etc attribute.  (A fully-featured 
> electable/muxselectable/etc will require a lot of code.  Having selectable 
> separate makes selectable a matter of two or three traps.)
> 
> Rod
> 
> On Tuesday 28 October 2003 4:28 pm, Adam Megacz wrote:
> > Hey, what if we merge selectable and {electable|muxselectable|etc} and
> > provide an attribute 'maxselectable' that defaults to 1?
> >
> > Then a 'selectable' is just a selectable in a group by itself, and an
> > 'electable' is just a selectable that's grouped with other
> > selectables?
> >
> > This generalizes nicely to the case where you have a list of items of
> > which a fixed number (say, only three) can be selected.
> >
> >   - a
> >
> > Charles Goodwin <[email protected]> writes:
> > > Ok, the choice is simple; one of the following 4.
> > >
> > > ["can-be-selected-widget" and "part-of-selection-group"]
> > >
> > > In no particular order:
> > > 1.  selectable and electable
> > > 2.  selectable and muxselectable
> > > 3.  selectable and selectionable
> > > 4.  markable and selectable
> > >
> > > Markable is a late entrant in that I've only recently really considered
> > > it.  Pros: short and sensible.  Cons: selected=bool not marked=bool.
> > >
> > > Please put in your prefered order.  I'll assign points according to
> > > position (1=5pts, 2=3pts, 3=2pts, 4=1pt) and add up the totals.
> > >
> > > Winner takes all.  Also, please add a yes/no on vote weighting where
> > > 'yes' means mine (as main widget dev) and Adam's (as XWT deity) votes
> > > count twice.
> > >
> > > My order: 4, 1, 3, 2
> > > On weighting: yes
> > >
> > > Please tell others to vote, although unrecognised names don't get to
> > > vote (ie if you haven't contributed / been around) so you can't sabotage
> > > it.
> > >
> > > - Charlie
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > widgets mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> widgets mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwt.org/listinfo/widgets
> 

-- 
"Education is not filling a bucket but lighting a fire." -- WB Yeats