Re: Last call on the selectable naming issue

Charles Goodwin wrote:
> Ok, the choice is simple; one of the following 4.
> 
> ["can-be-selected-widget" and "part-of-selection-group"]
> 
> In no particular order:
> 1.  selectable and electable
> 2.  selectable and muxselectable
> 3.  selectable and selectionable
> 4.  markable and selectable
> 
> Markable is a late entrant in that I've only recently really considered 
> it.  Pros: short and sensible.  Cons: selected=bool not marked=bool.
> 
> Please put in your prefered order.  I'll assign points according to 
> position (1=5pts, 2=3pts, 3=2pts, 4=1pt) and add up the totals.
> 
> Winner takes all.  Also, please add a yes/no on vote weighting where 
> 'yes' means mine (as main widget dev) and Adam's (as XWT deity) votes 
> count twice.
> 
> My order: 4, 1, 3, 2
> On weighting: yes

My order: 2, 4, 1, 3
On weighting: yes

Emiliano