Re: and this is from, um, an e.u. member
Tim Jansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 20 April 2003 18:38, dep wrote: > how, then, would you deal with an immigrant who has made it clear that > his purpose in entering your country was to escape prosecution > elsewhere and, while he's at it, to do destruction in your country? > would you make those acts illegal, or would you wait until he had, > say, killed someone? where do you think the line should be drawn? This depends on the country he escaped from. If it's legal system is comparable the person should be extradited. If this is not the case, extradition is certainly not acceptable. AFAIK Germany refuses extradition to other countries if the suspect could be punished by death. Concerning "destruction of my country". At least in Germany there are laws for this. For example membership in a terrorist organization is a crime. The case is not different from that of a native german who wants to do the same. I rather see someone to be prosecuted by a German court than in a country that does not respect human rights, even if this could result in the crime not being prosecuted. A free murderer is better than one who has been stoned to death. bye.. Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.