Re: Free speech: Perpetually at risk
Rob Kaper <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 04:52:51PM -0500, Andreas Pour wrote:
> http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1054966381827&p=1012571727102
> ("Media groups on Tuesday reacted with disbelief to the disclosure that the
> European Commission is considering a law to ban sexist television programmes and
> advertising.")
> * http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/25/1056449299754.html ("Sexist or
> raunchy images on television or in advertising could be banned across the
> European Union, under draft proposals.")
>
> Is the EU being some sort of New World Order super-state, or what exactly is
> going on there :-( ?
No idea whether it's true, but I doubt it. Not without the Netherlands
leaving the EU anyway.
Rob
--
Rob Kaper | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
[email protected] | temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
www.capsi.com | - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE++4DstppIl2G1SjcRAul+AKCXlBuAgCcGIgn0/OhxOT9jVIQbwgCgq2V6 AkJSfLkcRFjCS0IJW8Gqd7A= =GR61 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----