Re: [Fwd: Re: checking for GTK and glib in configure.in.in ?]

James Richard Tyrer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:

> i think flame wars stink, regardless for whose ammusement they are for.
> 
Then why are you almost at the point of starting one.
> 
>>>The misleading quote
>>
>>This quote is not misleading.  If new people are welcomed only under
>>certain conditions, then they are NOT welcomed. 
> 
> 
> wrong. if someone comes into your house and pees on the carpet, they probably 
> will be shown the door pretty quickly. this doesn't mean you don't want 
> anyone coming over, just that you're not overly fond of people who piss on 
> your rug. 
> 
> fortunately, most people have the good sense not to urinate on other people's 
> floors. _un_fortunately, not everyone does.
>
Your absurd analogy is totally out of the context in which I was speaking 
(which was about people "getting in the way")  No, I would not be happy to 
see those that urinated on my carpet.

But, if you said that people were welcome only if they kowtowed 
sufficiently you would be much closer to what I was thinking about.

Note: Zack started the flame war by deliberately misunderstanding what I 
said in order to attack me.  You have only taken a sentence out of context, 
but I still fail to see your point.
> 
>>	New people are welcomed only if the don't get in the way.
> 
> 
> it isn't about "getting in the way", it's about whether someone's primary 
> influence is as a disturber or the peace or a promoter of the effort.
> 
That may be what you think, but it isn't what the quoted speaker said.

> there are much appreciated KDE developers who at times "get in the way". some 
> even have had what amounts to a temper tantrum. i myself have thrown a few 
> poorly chosen, angry words about before that i've felt bad about afterwards. 
> but such slips of character are usually not the defining characteristics of 
> the person's involvement in the project. more often it's just a bad day or 
> not enough caffiene/tea/fresh air/sex/whatever...
> 
Yes, I was having a bad day.  I shouldn't have egged Zack on.  I do feel 
somewhat badly about it.  But some of what he said was so funny.

> most new people are not much (if any) trouble and what they bring to the 
> community and the project usually _far_ outweighs any downsides they bring 
> with them. this is not only an abstract observation, it's how most newcomers 
> are actually treated within KDE...
> 
This all depends on what is meant by 'getting in the way'.  I have my ideas 
about what it means -- that it refers to things which I have done in 
discussing bugs that people didn't want to concern themselves with.

> if this were not true, i could name several developers currently involved in 
> KDE who would've been shown the door a long time ago.
> 
<SNIP>
> 
>>{It is remarks such as that that I have labeled 8^) the 'arrogant
>>developer' syndrome}
> 
> 
> "cinnamon and sugary and softly spoken lies 
>  you never know just how you look through other people's eyes"

The problem does exist.  I gave it a factitious name rather than making 
personal remarks about anyone specific -- is that bad?

Too bad that you snipped out and didn't respond to my important points. 
But, it is a common rhetorical device -- to be picky about what the speaker 
said while totally ignoring his point.  Should I conclude that you don't 
wan to understand my point?

--
JRT


Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.