Re: Saddam Hussein: A Trial of Error?
Guillaume Laurent <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:50:01 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 21:49, Andreas Pour wrote: > As to the frequency of conspiracies - if a bunch of cops beat up on a > "suspect", do you think they will tell the world? If a surgeon makes a > mistake and kills a patient, even if his co-workers notice, do you think > they will tell the world? No, and these are all conspiracies No, they are just an aspect of a sub-culture (cops, doctors). It's like saying japanese not liking "gaijins" is a conspiracy. > One thing is for sure - the powerful, through the media, definitely like to > disparage "conspiracy theories". Have you ever worked in a large structure ? (big company or big administration). If so, I bet that you found its internal working to be much more cahotic than really organized. What makes you think it would be different for any government ? > They want you to think that anyone who > thinks important events, attacks, assassinations and the like are actually > *planned* (making them a conspiracy) is crazy. Because in the vast majority of cases, they are. When confronted to a conspiracy theory, I find that Occam's Razor is a good friend. Especially it's main specialisation : "don't assume malice for what stupidity can explain". At the moment, the US occupation of Iraq displays much more stupidity than cunningness. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.