Re: A possible other side of the new space project

On Monday 19 January 2004 22:02, dep wrote:

> i haven't read it, but shall, though not at the moment or anytime very
> soon 

I assume then that you don't know what the PNAC is. See here for a relatively 
good (though hardly objective) intro :

http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/PNAC-Primer.htm

> though from what you point out, 3.8 % of the gdp for defense in the
> current climate does not seem undue

My point is not to argue whether this number is justified or not. My point is 
that the current policy of the Bush administration appears to be matching 
what PNAC has advocated, which shouldn't be surprising given that virtually 
all the top members of the current US government are affiliated with it.

The problem is what kind policy PNAC advocates.

-- 
						Guillaume.
						http://www.telegraph-road.org

Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.