Re: My take on the State of the Union

James Richard Tyrer <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:36:00 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.cafe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Steve Hutton wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> 
>>Steve Hutton wrote:
>>
>>>In this case the answer is that Bush clearly doesn't want economical
>>>cars to actually be produced, but he would like to be perceived as
>>>wanting them, if it buys him a vote or two.
>>
>>How is this different from the Democrats boondoggle trying to make the 70 MPG mid size car 
>>that wasn't producible either?
> 
> 
> I don't know the specifics of what you are referring to, but clearly
> increasing the MPG standards is a more realistic way to reduce fossil
> fuel consumption than vague promises of hydrogen cars 10 years from now.
> 
The problem is that currently, "increasing MPG standards" means telling people what 
vehicles that they are allowed to buy.  The idea of Hydrogen cars is also to reduce air 
pollution (questionable) and CO2 production (atomic power required to produce the Hydrogen).

> In any case, if the Democrats had also made a frivously political promise
> to produce hydrogen cars and then never mentioned it again, would that
> make it ok for Bush to do the same?
> 
> If we choose to judge our leaders by comparing their performance to the
> worst behavior of the opposing political party, the bar will be very low 
> indeed - no matter which party is in office.

That wasn't my point which was that both parties have done nothing realistic to produce a 
more efficient and low pollution vehicle -- I am criticizing both parties.

--
JRT


Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected]
http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal
opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.