Re: Time for a Re-Evaluation of 9/11
dep <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:59:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.cafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
quoth Aaron Seigo: | Dennis, what does this have to do with GNOME and KDE? good question, for which there are a couple of answers, one of which is the one i had in mind. the other one first. i caught 37 different flavors of hell when a site i own ran an editorial which said that there seemed to be a strong antisemitic sentiment in kde. at that time, the official voice of kde in this country was someone who, in the post that started this thread and in many others, has proved that anything official coming from kde in the u.s. was indeed passed through a raging antisemite. that his endeavors in promotion of kde met terrible failure and that the success of kde here was because of its own qualities and in spite of him speaks well of those qualities. but what i had in mind was that it is just a kind of sad observation that two immigrants to the u.s. happened to be, respectively, the public faces of gnome and kde. they were, of course, miguel and andreas. the sad thing being the difference in the choices they made, and how those different choices have played out. in that respect, it was a comparison of two people rather than two desktops. there is a third point, which is worth considering. do a whois lookup of kde.com and one finds andreas's company. now, with substantially less stretch than has been employed on this list in characterizing organizations, companies, and careers due to association or to past statements, many people would very likely conclude that the company which owns kde.com is antisemitic to the point of . . . well, to just about any point one could imagine. and as least insofar as the .com domain name is concerned, that company *owns* the kde name. now. that may be something that is of no concern to the people involved with kde. i am certain it is something in which kde's competitors would take delight. i am further certain that, were some of his posts to this list publicized, it would be sufficient to get distributions all over the place to flat-out drop kde. they would almost have to. guilt by association? yes, but something scarcely new to this list. a failure to separate what someone says in an unofficial capacity from what he says officially? that's nothing new here, either. sauce for the goose and all. but all i had in mind was the comparison between what miguel made of the opportunities he found, and what andreas made of the rather greater opportunities that were available to him, and to observe that it's sad. -- dep Hippocratic oath: An ethical construct whose initial tenet, "first, do no harm," prohibits doctors from treating lawyers. Kde-cafe mailing list - [email protected] http://ofb.biz/lists/listinfo.cgi/kde-cafe DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this mailinglist are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent OfB.biz: Open for Business, KDE or the author's employer.