Re: Re: qt-only?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 23 December 2004 3:21 am, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
> Ok, well I've answered some of my own question. The KDElibs patch is
> still pretty huge, and I've only looked at about a fifth of it. So far,
> I've only found one meaningful addition, the rest has all been
> ifdef'ing out X11 specific code. Does anyone know why KDE has not
> integrated this? It would make sense: patches that do not break any
> existing builds, but enable future extensions should be integrated, no?
>
> Is anyone on PR duty with the KDE people? If someone wants to give me
> some guidelines (last time I tried, I missed some things and ended up
> doing nothing useful :-/), I could do the leg-work of e-mailing the
> appropriate people to try and improve integration.
>
> Thanx again,
> JP

Well the reason the patches still aren't in really has nothing to do with KDE, 
we have simply been busy and never got around to putting them in.  The admin 
patch I think is the only one that has been put in lately.  The simplest 
approach is to to one module and then go through it one app at a time 
cleaning up the patch and submitting it to the author.  It is just a bit of 
work, no conspearicy here. 

- -Benjamin Meyer 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFByyhm1rZ3LTw38vIRAovMAKCM6YlM8cqJLw3thy9w14rn+Ag6bwCfWfJY
R60OgYRqfpvjKhe7ymDMj48=
=JgZh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----