Re: Re: qt-only?
IceFox <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:20:49 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.darwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 23 December 2004 4:19 am, John Davidorff Pell wrote: > Another question has come up: > What are these patches against? > > There are modifications in here that have not-one-single-thing to do > with MacOSX. Last time I noticed this, it was because a libtool update > was needed in KDE cvs. I asked then that such > not-remotely-related-to-the-same-things patches be separated for a) > easy maintenance b) easy integration c) cleanliness of form. I'll ask > that again. > > Why do I get the feeling I'm posting to a black hole? > > Thanx, > JP I know taht RangerRick has some more updated patches for kdelibs/kdebase. Assuming he isn't on vacation he will probably respond. - -Benjamin Meyer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFByyih1rZ3LTw38vIRAsiuAKCuZb+GYcK3h3ShI471y1ViFc7zLQCfafzj x9+Ux+/c6IGyncRRL/2a7rI= =uCZi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----