Re: Re: qt-only?

IceFox <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:20:49 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.darwin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 23 December 2004 4:19 am, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
> Another question has come up:
> What are these patches against?
>
> There are modifications in here that have not-one-single-thing to do
> with MacOSX. Last time I noticed this, it was because a libtool update
> was needed in KDE cvs. I asked then that such
> not-remotely-related-to-the-same-things patches be separated for a)
> easy maintenance b) easy integration c) cleanliness of form. I'll ask
> that again.
>
> Why do I get the feeling I'm posting to a black hole?
>
> Thanx,
> JP

I know taht RangerRick has some more updated patches for kdelibs/kdebase.  
Assuming he isn't on vacation he will probably respond.

- -Benjamin Meyer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFByyih1rZ3LTw38vIRAsiuAKCuZb+GYcK3h3ShI471y1ViFc7zLQCfafzj
x9+Ux+/c6IGyncRRL/2a7rI=
=uCZi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----