Re: from kde-integrative to freedesktop.org...
Alexander Neundorf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.debian |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 08:41, Philippe Fremy wrote: > > "our stuff" should include everything related to using the facilities/ > > features/widgets of one DE/toolkit in a "foreign" environment. > > I.e. kde widgets for ooo, the Qt theme for gtk, the Qt event loop in gtk > > apps, kde-look for mozilla, kioslaves for everybody, but also the other > > way round, gtk themes for Qt, maybe kparts-bonobo related things. > > > > How about "Cross Toolkit Development", short ctd ? > > Sounds friendly also for gtk developers. > > > > Important: who wants to create and maintain the web site ? > > The one I started still seem pretty good to me (although unfinished) :-) : > > http://kde.ground.cz/tiki-index.php?page=KDE%2C+the+integrative+desktop Yes, it's really not bad. But it's hosted on the kde wiki pages. I never visited this site before, and I guess that's true for many other people. An own homepage will get more publicity. And we need a mailinglist where we can gather all the people working on stuff like this. I will contact them via direct email as soon as we have one. > The only thing I am concerned about hosting it on freedesktop is that we > might not be able to be as liberal as we wish about what we display. If you > call it Cross Toolkit Development and the whole thing is about improving > KDE, that's not good. I understand what you mean, but I think we should consider this open for all cross-toolkit projects (even if there are currently no others). I'll even write an invitation email to the gtk/gnome development mailing lists. > I am not aware of any gtk themes for Qt, nore kparts-bonobo related thing. But it would be a good thing if there was something. I guess most people working on such stuff have similar issues to solve. > I am under the impression that Gnome people run no KDE application, and are > thus less concerned about integrating KDE than we are about integrating > Gnome or OpenOffice. If they don't want to take part, it's not our problem. > My personal feeling is that what can be used outside KDE should be hosted > on fd.org: fuse and QtGtk. The other things (Qt themes for Gtk, icons, ...) > should stay in KDE as they are really KDE specific. On the other hand, that > would mean splitting the hosting which is never good. Yes. > All in all, I would prefer to keep it in KDE until a similar effort appears > on the Gnome front, which would give us a hint that we should move it to > fd.org. But, if we move directly to fd.org, we are giving an incentive for > creating a similar effort on the Gnome side. Not a similar effort, but joining our effort. This is made easier for them by not using "KDE" or "Qt" in the title. Bye Alex -- Work: [email protected] - http://www.jenoptik-los.de Home: [email protected] - http://www.kde.org [email protected] - http://www.neundorf.net