Re: building qtatspi from git
Jude DaShiell <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:25:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
One is archlinux (bleeding edge) the other is slint (in testing). Others beyond these two drives and I don't know their status yet. On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 07:29:29 > From: Frederik Gladhorn <[email protected]> > To: Jude DaShiell <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: building qtatspi from git > > On mandag 16. oktober 2017 12.18.07 CEST Jude DaShiell wrote: >> I'll search the package archives and see if I can even find qt5. As it >> is, apparently the qtatspi build didn't complete perfectly. I ran >> kbomber and there was complete silence. > > OK, which distribution are you using? I assume you have Orca working? Try any > simple application, kwrite or such, and assuming you have a recent > distribution it's going to be Qt 5 based. > > Cheers, > Frederik > > >> >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >>> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:25:05 >>> From: Frederik Gladhorn <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: Jude DaShiell <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: building qtatspi from git >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> please consider using things based on Qt 5 where not qt-at-spi is needed. >>> The plugin became part of Qt itself and is in much better shape than it >>> ever was in Qt 4 times. >>> >>> Qt 5 applications should work out of the box, of course with issues to be >>> expected, but they should in general work with Orca. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Frederik >>> >>> On l?rdag 14. oktober 2017 20.35.53 CEST Jude DaShiell wrote: >>>> When I did cmake . in top directory the make appeared to run correctly >>>> with exception of two warnings and when I did make everything appeared to >>>> make properly. However make test threw an error 8 and I'm curious as to >>>> whether the package is ready for installation or do I need to suppress >>>> those warnings and build again? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- > > > --