Re: building qtatspi from git
Jeremy Whiting <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:06:09 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.accessibility |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADWV2K7=N1t_x2CfnFMzs2Ga66c0rdnS=7+VDm8BLWupvVix0A@mail.gmail.com> |
What versions of say kwrite are those running/using? Most should be KDE Applications 16.x or 17.x which are Qt5 based and do not need QtAtspi at all. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Jude DaShiell <[email protected]> wrote: > One is archlinux (bleeding edge) the other is slint (in testing). Others > beyond these two drives and I don't know their status yet. > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 07:29:29 >> From: Frederik Gladhorn <[email protected]> >> To: Jude DaShiell <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: building qtatspi from git >> >> On mandag 16. oktober 2017 12.18.07 CEST Jude DaShiell wrote: >> >>> I'll search the package archives and see if I can even find qt5. As it >>> is, apparently the qtatspi build didn't complete perfectly. I ran >>> kbomber and there was complete silence. >>> >> >> OK, which distribution are you using? I assume you have Orca working? Try >> any >> simple application, kwrite or such, and assuming you have a recent >> distribution it's going to be Qt 5 based. >> >> Cheers, >> Frederik >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >>> >>>> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:25:05 >>>> From: Frederik Gladhorn <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Cc: Jude DaShiell <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: building qtatspi from git >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> please consider using things based on Qt 5 where not qt-at-spi is >>>> needed. >>>> The plugin became part of Qt itself and is in much better shape than it >>>> ever was in Qt 4 times. >>>> >>>> Qt 5 applications should work out of the box, of course with issues to >>>> be >>>> expected, but they should in general work with Orca. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Frederik >>>> >>>> On l?rdag 14. oktober 2017 20.35.53 CEST Jude DaShiell wrote: >>>> >>>>> When I did cmake . in top directory the make appeared to run correctly >>>>> with exception of two warnings and when I did make everything appeared >>>>> to >>>>> make properly. However make test threw an error 8 and I'm curious as >>>>> to >>>>> whether the package is ready for installation or do I need to suppress >>>>> those warnings and build again? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> > -- > >