Re: PyKF5 use of the SIP second declaration
Stephen Kelly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Shaheed Haque wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the > second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here: > I suggest that for consistency the second set of parameters should also be > an array: That makes sense to me. I'm not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate names which convey what the second set of values are for? Thanks, Steve.