Re: PyKF5 use of the SIP second declaration
Shaheed Haque <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHAc2jeeYYYuuveKiMzYW2pY12D=MOWo6N16izntKh7rgYy+0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for confirming. As for the second declaration etc, the SIP specification at http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html refers to it as the "*c++-signature*", so I'll look into replacing the number with a suffix like "_cpp". Thanks, Shaheed On 21 January 2017 at 10:58, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > Shaheed Haque wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the > > second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here: > > > I suggest that for consistency the second set of parameters should also > be > > an array: > > That makes sense to me. > > I'm not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate > names which convey what the second set of values are for? > > Thanks, > > Steve. > >