Re: PyKF5 use of the SIP second declaration

Shaheed Haque <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings
Message-ID <CAHAc2jeeYYYuuveKiMzYW2pY12D=MOWo6N16izntKh7rgYy+0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for confirming.

As for the second declaration etc, the SIP specification at
http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html refers to it
as the "*c++-signature*", so I'll look into replacing the number with a
suffix like "_cpp".

Thanks, Shaheed

On 21 January 2017 at 10:58, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:

> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the
> > second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here:
>
> > I suggest that for consistency the second set of parameters should also
> be
> > an array:
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> I'm not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate
> names which convey what the second set of values are for?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve.
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.