Re: KDE Review: Skladnik (t.g.f.k.a. KSokoban), returning a KDE1-KDE3 age dino

On Sunday, 12 November 2023 22:57:55 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Would the file COPYING (GPLv2) in the toplevel dir then default the license
> for these files?
> See https://phabricator.kde.org/source/svn/browse/trunk/kdegames/;10132
> In short, what to do here for reuse checks? Ignore, because old repo and
> thus legacy rights? Can files be skipped in the check?

There are similar what-could-it-have-been questions around some of the kpat 
card decks -- later moved into kdegames. There was a short thread about that a 
month or two ago, although i forget where.

Since these are "source" you could well consider them to fall under the source 
license of the program. You could try chasing down Anders if you want to 
double-check.

You can always add an entry in the .dep5 file describing these povray sources 
as "best effort" documentation of the license, and then SPDX tag them GPLv2.

[ade]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQSBF2/XAien2OQ2HyxoKz+gse3TtQUCZVN8YwAKCRBoKz+gse3T
tegSAQDKL93tkeJagzNQATFWzGg9iYy95n9CJwQ91lsI76/9LQD+JpXaKq+DQjnf
jY6N88Tx8+bVyaW+L2E8bFnzes51rww=
=YFYW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----