Re: [devel] Network Konfiguration with an KDE-Program
"C. Gatzemeier" <[email protected]> Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:10:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.debian,gmane.comp.kde.devel.debian |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Sonntag, 18. Januar 2004 11:30 schrieb Juanjo Alvarez: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:52:38PM +0100, Sascha Morr wrote: > > => http://knetworkconf.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Will it be a goot joice for us? > > Yes and no. Yes because it seems to mostly do the job of configuring > network interfaces. No because it depends on Gnome System Tools-Network, > a convoluted and huge perl file that tries to do everything for every > distribution. Yes, it is bad that everything is hardcoded into it. > I think is preferable to have a smaller network tool but more dedicated > to Debian (like Red Hat, Mandrake, Suse and others have) All those approaches don't bing configurability of Free Software in general a single step further. They are only of limited use (distribution company specific). > where we can > quickly make any changes we want than a huge program that depends on some > external tools. I think that depends. Being able to quickly make changes and not hardcoding large programs is good. GST backends hardcode everything in perl. A new functionality needs a new large "all distro" backand module and new frontend modules in every frontend. Externalizing a light distribution independent and collaboratively maintained common config access functionality however benefits Free Software in general. So it is not that a bad idea, but CFG is a much better approach to this I think. There the backends and middlelayer is written without any distribution or config specific hardcoding. These specifics are provided with external meta-config files easy to adopt. http://linuxwiki.de/Config4Gnu/EnglishFAQ cheers Christian