Re: Improving KDE Plasma Performance on Low-Resource Systems
Reindl Harald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.general,gmane.comp.kde.devel.plasma |
|---|---|
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 21.08.26 um 20:18 schrieb Aaron Rainbolt: > It's worth noting that modern web browsers and the modern web as a > whole is very resource-intensive. One tab with a modern chat > application (Element) can consume a gigabyte of RAM on its own. which shows the bullshit in modern IT at it's own with 1 GB o RAM i had running an Win2000 Server with Corel draw, photoshop, VMware with a small Linux system playing music in the background while try to learn software development with "Miscorosft Visual Basic 6" don't get me wrong but modern software *by far+ don't have that much functionality and comfort compared with the hardware ressources we a throwing at it > If you're trying to do serious work, the reality is you may simply > need a faster computer. You could probably use the device you're > looking at with a lightweight desktop like IceWM, and it can still do > things like chat on IRC, compose text documents, and run a text-only > web browser or perhaps a very lightweight, incomplete browser like > Dillo or Netsurf, but what you're trying to do is simply not something > your system can handle. that's nonsense after 25 years i still need to see any piece of complex software which can't be optimized by MAGNITUDES i have written enough stuff in the past to know that a few minutes of thinking and chnage a few lines of code can make things 2, 5 oder 10 times faster or consume only half or the memory with the same outcome it's always a tradeoff between throwing money on hardware or human ressoucres on a problem but in case of re-used code even small optimizations can have a huge impact on a whole ecosystem a single line of code within a loop where the result before would be the same can make things *100 times faster* and that single line outside the loop not only itslef is 100 times faster - inside this call you can have dozens of functions with the same impact becuase of loops in itself often you can#t measure such things, write sofwtgare which works perfectly and fast in all test cases until you don't have 100 but 100.000 iterations and then a few lines of code changes can make the difference of taking 1 second or 10 minutes, faced it often enough in my daily job and there are cases where you can gain *1.000 times of performance* imagine what that means worldwide in case of energy alone multiplied with millios of machines - it won't save the world but i don't see a reason to buy new hardware and consume tons of energy without a good reason