Re: Configuration objects in libkolabxml

Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> Hey Thomas,
> 
> With the whole PIM-Item Relations coming up, do you still need color 
> configuration for categories for compatibility with outlook, apple ical and 
> kontact e3 (which have color-coding for categories AFAIK)?	

"I" certainly don't need that but it was meant to integrate better with
Outlook and such.
> 
> And if yes, do you need an upgrade path from the KEP:12 version (do you 
> already have category colors in production systems)?

Nope, it's not in production yet. It was too much effort to build that into
Horde back when KEP:12 was created. Please check with Georg who initially
drafted KEP:12.

~Thomas

> 
> On Wednesday 23 May 2012 23.22:50 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
>> On Monday 21 May 2012 15.59:58 Thomas Brüderli wrote:
>>> Hello Christian
>> Hey Thomas,
>>
>>> What is the schedule for finally implementing Configuration objects
>>> according to KEP 9 [1] in libkolabxml? They are of course less important
>>> than Contacts, Events and ToDos but should not be ignored at all.
>> I implemented a first version of the dictionary and categorycolor
>> configuration objects, which you can find in the latest master.
>>
>>> And they are actually in use by Roundcube (in Kolab 2.4) to store personal
>>> dictionaries and thus they also have to be addressed in the format
>>> migration path.
>> Ok, I did not address that yet. Do we need an upgrade path only for the
>> dictionary or also categorycolor configuration?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Christian
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> [1] http://wiki.kolab.org/KEP:9#Configuration_storage_in_XML_objects
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kolab-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Kolab-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel