how to deal with kdepimlibs patches
Christian Mollekopf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kolab,gmane.comp.kde.kolab.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Kolab Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <1720913.CCs0juBREZ@myhost2> |
Hey Jeroen, I was wondering how we can deal with kdepimlibs patches, which are required for libkolab. E.g. I improved the notes format in kdepimlibs, so kontact preserves all information of kolabnotes (i.e. the lastModified date or attachments are otherwise lost), which will only be available with kde 4.9. Now I have also a patch for the imaplibrary, to allow for proxy authentication (for the format upgrade tool), which I can't even get into master because it's frozen during the release period (yes, that sucks), and will only be released with 4.10 (unless backported). So I'm wondering if we should have our own clone of the repo as staging area, based on which we develop libkolab and friends. At least now, where a lot is changing, we can't wait for half a year to get our patches released. Normally, when master is not frozen, when can of course get patches in, but it still takes a while for the review process and such. So an own clone would make us much more agile, but of course we would need to make sure all patches go eventually upstream. The other issue with that is of course that libkolab depends on a version of kdepimlibs >= master, but in the long run I suppose we need that flexibility if we want to work with kdepimlibs code. I would see the kdepimlibs clone as intermediate step until we can split up kdepimlibs anyways. What do you think? Cheers, Christian _______________________________________________ Kolab-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.intevation.de/mailman/listinfo/kolab-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk/R1lsACgkQF4TVOOpldAB7GgCfcnMWwCgQLgdKgYVkHyZuL25u yvMAnAzm7M/Hp+Ae0c1+TQcKVviVhAX9 =kKN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----