Re: Some correspondents have kolab_user@kolab_server instead of From address in their replies
Johannes Ranke <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Jan 2022 10:15:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kroupware |
|---|---|
| Organization | jrwb |
| Message-ID | <2999070.FPqOWhcAEK__48638.2064338372$1641287772$gmane$org@ryz> |
Hi Lennart, thanks for sharing your suggestions! In order to check if SPF and DKIM are aligned with the envelope from, I have now added a DMARC entry with an e-mail address for reporting to my DNS, so I should start receiving reports about any problems. Kind regards, Johannes Am Montag, 3. Januar 2022, 15:00:15 CET schrieb Lennart: > Hi Johannes, > > My hunch is that kolab.jrwb.de is set by Postfix as the envelope from > (aka SMTP FROM aka Return-Path, as opposed to the From header in the > message itself). The Sender header may be added either by Postfix or an > intermediate SMTP server to indicate the original envelope from. > > My envelope froms are also different from From headers and I'm not aware > of any problems. My only advice would be to have the top domain part > (i.e. jrwb.de) identical to the From header (to appease spam filters) > and to make sure that SPF records are set for the envelope from domain. > It's also important that emails to the envelope from address are > deliverable, since it is where bounces are sent. > > Hence, in deciding whether to use different envelope from addresses, I > think your primary concerns are: (a) are the SPF records set up > correctly for all domains that will be used as envelope from? (b) Where > do you want bounce emails to be delivered to? > > Best, > > Lennart > > On 08-12-2021 09:16, Johannes Ranke wrote: > > ... > > > > > This leaves me wondering if the Sender: should not be set to my > > > > primary e- > > > > > mail, and if yes, how I could achieve this. > > > > I found some discussion on Stackoverflow on this [1], leading to RFC > > 4021, updated by RFC 5322 [2]. All the RFCs which I looked up say that > > a Sender: header should only be included if the author of the message > > and the transmitter are not identical. > > > > > > So should I tell postfix not to include a Sender: address, and if yes, > > how? I have no delegates specified in the kolab-webadmin, and none of > > my users need this functionality. > > > > > > Johannes > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4367358/whats-the-difference-between-s > > ender-from-and-return-path > > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4367358/whats-the-difference-between > > -sender-from-and-return-path> > > > > > > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2 > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Johannes Ranke Wissenschaftlicher Berater 07624 8099027 https://jrwb.de