Re: Some correspondents have kolab_user@kolab_server instead of From address in their replies
Lennart <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:57:33 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kroupware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0102017e24f3a13c-cdbb59e8-af40-4ce6-b6a9-64a671385ff0-000000__49008.0021832668$1641298328$gmane$org@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> |
Hi Johannes, You're welcome. For your information: the mailing list reports johannes.ranke [at] jrwb [dot] de as your address, but the email I sent to that address was bounced. Best, Lennart On 04-01-2022 10:15, Johannes Ranke wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > thanks for sharing your suggestions! In order to check if SPF and DKIM are > aligned with the envelope from, I have now added a DMARC entry with an e-mail > address for reporting to my DNS, so I should start receiving reports about any > problems. > > Kind regards, > > Johannes > > Am Montag, 3. Januar 2022, 15:00:15 CET schrieb Lennart: >> Hi Johannes, >> >> My hunch is that kolab.jrwb.de is set by Postfix as the envelope from >> (aka SMTP FROM aka Return-Path, as opposed to the From header in the >> message itself). The Sender header may be added either by Postfix or an >> intermediate SMTP server to indicate the original envelope from. >> >> My envelope froms are also different from From headers and I'm not aware >> of any problems. My only advice would be to have the top domain part >> (i.e. jrwb.de) identical to the From header (to appease spam filters) >> and to make sure that SPF records are set for the envelope from domain. >> It's also important that emails to the envelope from address are >> deliverable, since it is where bounces are sent. >> >> Hence, in deciding whether to use different envelope from addresses, I >> think your primary concerns are: (a) are the SPF records set up >> correctly for all domains that will be used as envelope from? (b) Where >> do you want bounce emails to be delivered to? >> >> Best, >> >> Lennart >> >> On 08-12-2021 09:16, Johannes Ranke wrote: >>> ... >>> >>>> This leaves me wondering if the Sender: should not be set to my >>> primary e- >>> >>>> mail, and if yes, how I could achieve this. >>> I found some discussion on Stackoverflow on this [1], leading to RFC >>> 4021, updated by RFC 5322 [2]. All the RFCs which I looked up say that >>> a Sender: header should only be included if the author of the message >>> and the transmitter are not identical. >>> >>> >>> So should I tell postfix not to include a Sender: address, and if yes, >>> how? I have no delegates specified in the kolab-webadmin, and none of >>> my users need this functionality. >>> >>> >>> Johannes >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4367358/whats-the-difference-between-s >>> ender-from-and-return-path >>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4367358/whats-the-difference-between >>> -sender-from-and-return-path> >>> >>> >>> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2 >>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.kolab.org/mailman/listinfo/users >