D14868: RFC: Keep Deleted transients above old parents

davidedmundson added a comment.


  > Also, could someone please say whether that's a right way to solve the problem?
  
  Not read the full code, but in general makes sense, the unconstrained stacking order contains deleted in the same place as the original, the constrained version should too.
  
  Maybe you can simplify it with some new virtuals on the toplevel for isTransient/transientFor rather than having two code paths.

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D14868

To: zzag, #kwin
Cc: davidedmundson, kwin, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, Pitel, iodelay, bwowk, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart