D13720: [effects] Rewrite the Dim Inactive effect

Vlad Zagorodniy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
zzag added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> davidedmundson wrote in diminactive.cpp:104-105
> constBegin/constEnd

It won't be compiled:

`(*transitionIt)` would return `const T &`, where `T = TimeLine`. It would work with pointers because what iterator returns is a const reference to a pointer, e.g.

  const (TimeLine *) &

> davidedmundson wrote in diminactive.cpp:240
> why the reset?
> 
> won't that flicker if you
> 
> inactive -> active -> inactive
> 
> really really quickly.

Good question. The In and the Out animations are different so that's fine to reset them.

> really really quickly

It will be noticeable only when animation time factor is 4x+.

On the other hand, TimeLine tries its best to smooth "transition" from old duration to new duration. The problem is when we're truncating duration(e.g. 250ms -> 160ms). But that's easy to fix:

  timeLine.setDuration(smallerDuration);
  if (timeLine.done()) {
      timeLine.reset();
  }

I'll change it.

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

BRANCH
  rewrite-diminactive-effect

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D13720

To: zzag, #kwin, #plasma, #vdg, davidedmundson
Cc: davidedmundson, abetts, ngraham, kwin, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, Pitel, iodelay, bwowk, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, jensreuterberg, sebas, apol, mart
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.