Re: More strict testing requirements?
Vlad Zagorodniy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.kwin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/16/18 7:29 PM, Martin Flöser wrote: > with build #195 KWin is green again. That's awesome! :-) > Given the experience I would like to suggest that we setup rules for > handling failures. > > 1. Prior to push ctest should be run locally > 2. Whenever a test fails on build.kde.org no change is allowed to be > pushed which does not fix the failure. > 3. If a failure on build.kde.org is not fixed after 3 days the change > which introduced the regression gets reverted In addition to that, it would be great to see more tighter integration between CI and Phabricator, something what GitHub folks have for very long time. Cheers, Vlad (Martin, sorry for spamming, I clicked wrong button first time)