D29459: Scripting: Make client.activities writable

tcorreabr added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> meven wrote in abstract_client.h:888
> Shouldn't activitiesChanged be `activitiesChanged()` instead of `activitiesChanged(KWin::AbstractClient* client);` or `activitiesChanged(KWin::Toplevel* topLevel);`

I don't see the necessity of the parameter either, but I'm not an KWin expert. Can I submit the change or does anyone think differently?

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D29459

To: tcorreabr, #kwin, zzag
Cc: meven, abetts, zzag, kwin, Orage, cacarry, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, iodelay, crozbo, bwowk, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, romangg, jensreuterberg, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart