Re: encouragement
Scott & Joyce <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi James, Your original post did prompt my encouragement e-mail ..... We work away on something, most often trying to do our best, and at times I'm sure we hit points when we need a bit of encouragement. If an e-mail like yours comes through at a time like that it might make the day a bit gray. Like Nico said, it seemed your e-mail came out of the blue and lacked information that would help Eric diagnose the problem. But then maybe your trying to get your work done and were frustrated? I don't know what your day was like either. My thoughts were of the developers of open source software, and in this case Eric -- who knows what's happening in their lives on a particular day -- and too often the only material that makes it into comments and mailing lists are critical. So, not being in a position to be able to send financial support, or help with development, I though I would at least let Eric and the other developers and contributors know there are folks who use their software with thanks. Scott. James Ellis wrote: > Hi Eric > > I'll take this as a sideways jab at my questions about Quanta's CPU / memory > usage. It always amuses/frustrates me when a developer of a product gets > frustrated when people ask pointy questions of their product. This is > generally based on an assumption that the user is an idiot for not having > done what you would have done or not having the same thought patterns as you. > As a developer you need to realise that users will raise questions, some > valid, of your products in ways that may confound you. This happens to me and > I have learnt, over time, to deal with it and understand that users will > always use a product the way they want to rather than the way the developers > intended it to. Get a group of random people together and study how they > browse the web and you will see what I mean. > > >