Re: Digikam-users Digest, Vol 241, Issue 8
Remco Viëtor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2842798.QOukoFCf94@manticore> |
On mercredi 11 juin 2025 09:54:08 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Steve Franks wrote: > SF- When software rotates an image it has to unpack the jpeg, rotate the > image which may lose a few bytes, then recreate the jpeg. (...) Well, not always... Jpegs *can* be rotated over (multiples of) 90° without any need to re-encode the image, so without any extra loss (some limitations apply). See e.g. https://www.guyrutenberg.com/2016/04/22/jpeg-rotation/, which also mentions Digikam, btw. Or a program can just set an EXIF tag, which then should be interpreted by the viewing program (or editor). Also lossless... But that won't work if you use the Digikam *image editor* to do the rotation (as an editor, it needs to decode the jpeg for its operation. So that decoding is done at startup.) Remco