Re: KDE 4.10 or Kde 4.A

On Saturday 14 August 2010 21:28:52 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> On Thursday 12 August 2010 16:50:57 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > A and B in version numbers are usually associated with Alpha and Beta.
> > Going hexadecimal just for the sake of being different is counter
> > productive.
> 
> Besides, it would probably break a lot of tools 'out there' in
> distributions ;-)
> 
> So a -1 from me.

I'm prety sure Augustin was partly kiding about the number turning to leter 
thing. 

think what he was mostly refering to was toe the possability of giving biguer 
focus to the code name is we so hever get to nº +4.9. wich i would totaly 
agree. 

> > On Thursday 12 August 2010 13:47:52 Agustín Benito wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > are we going to reach KDE 4.10?
> > > 
> > > If so....since the numbers is something for tech purposes
> > > 
> > >  (users usually just update their systems)...what about KDE 4.A,
> > >  4.B...4.F
> > > 
> > > it would be funny, maybe not useful, but funny. I hate the 2.26.32
> > > number from the kernel.
> > > 
> > > saludos

-- 
oxygen guy, "I make the pretty pictures"
 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.