Re: Do we release SC or not?

2010/9/1 Anne Wilson <[email protected]>

> On Tuesday 31 Aug 2010 19:27:59 Troy Unrau wrote:
> > SC was never intended to be an externally marketed term.
>
> This is not the first time this sort of statement has been made, and it's
> time
> to argue with it.  We were told that the decision had been made, and we
> should
> now only refer to the software as KDE SC.  I spent many hours going through
> UserBase pages making changes to fit the definitions we were given at that
> time.  Now, it seems I have to go through them all again and take them out.
> We had the same situation with plasmoids and widgets.
>
> Can we please have minds made up and relatively irreversible before we ask
> people to do extra work?
>
> Anne
> --
> KDE Community Working Group
> New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
"KDE SC 4.5.1 is a recommended update for everyone running KDE SC 4.5.0 or
earlier versions."

@Troy: Sounds to me using SC is not that bad. How we should put this
sentence the other way? "KDE Development Platform 4.5.1, Applications 4.5.1
and Plasma Workspaces 4.5.1 are recommended updates for everyone running KDE
Development Platform 4.5.0, Applications 4.5.0 or Plasma Workspaces 4.5.0 or
earlier versions."?

 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.