Re: Do we release SC or not?
John Tapsell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2 September 2010 00:42, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 04:46:08 am Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Bart Otten wrote: >> > @Troy: Sounds to me using SC is not that bad. >> >> in technical contexts, it can be. particularly internally. for outward >> facing communication, however, it isn't great for reasons that have >> already been covered rather thoroughly. >> >> > How we should put this >> > sentence the other way? "KDE Development Platform 4.5.1, Applications >> > 4.5.1 and Plasma Workspaces 4.5.1 are recommended updates for everyone >> > running KDE Development Platform 4.5.0, Applications 4.5.0 or Plasma >> > Workspaces 4.5.0 or earlier versions."? >> >> "Version 4.5.1 of the KDE Platform, Workspaces and Applications were made >> today. Upgrading is recommended to those running older versions." >> >> with practice, we'll get better at these formulations and they'll come more >> naturally with time. > > I understand the goal here, but not having a name for the thing that gets > released is confusing. Indeed. I did a quick search and LWN, osnews, digg and slashdot have all used the term "KDE SC" now in headline titles. _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.