Re: Do we release SC or not?

Stuart Jarvis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <201009021324.29395.stuart.jarvis__8838.48626767776$1283430305$gmane$org@gmail.com>
On Thursday 02 September 2010 13:06:15 Bart Otten wrote:
> 2010/9/2 Stuart Jarvis <[email protected]>
> 
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 22:35:01 Arthur Schiwon wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday 31 August 2010 20:27:59 Troy Unrau wrote:
> > > > Hi, it's Troy here, aka the branding police...
> > > > 
> > > > SC was never intended to be an externally marketed term. It was
> > > > supposed to be something we can use to refer to the 'bunch of stuff
> > > > that has in common this release engineering artifact where they
> > > > happen to be simultaneously released'. What happened was that people
> > > > simply read this as 'where-ever you see KDE, write KDE SC' - failure
> > > > on our part.
> > > 
> > > Please correct me, but the paragraph "The KDE Software Compilation" in
> > 
> > the
> > 
> > > rebranding announcement
> > > (http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand) said:
> > > 
> > > »The KDE community does regular releases of a core set of KDE software
> > > products. These releases are called the KDE Software Compilation and
> > 
> > tagged
> > 
> > > with a version number, e.g. "The KDE community is releasing KDE
> > > Software Compilation 4.4". «
> > 
> > Ok:
> > - "core set of KDE software products" - i.e. more than one, in fact they
> > were
> > listed in the section above in the article
> > - "these releases are called the KDE Software Compilation" - also true,
> > if you
> > need a word for the whole lot
> > 
> > The original intention (clear from the original proposal and also in the
> > meeting where we fleshed all this out - but, it seems, not from the
> > article)
> > was to emphasise the products. But we recognised there *are* times when a
> > group term (SC) is needed. Unfortunately, we didn't follow through the
> > logic
> > with the 4.4 releases and used SC in our announcement titles - although
> > the announcement text did emphasise the products. For the 4.5 release
> > day, we did
> > separate announcements for each product group. For 4.5.1 we reverted
> > (incorrectly) to the old formulation for the title.
> > 
> > > To me it sounds like the term Software Compilation (or simply SC)
> > > should
> > 
> > be
> > 
> > > used in announcements and it is also the reason why we at
> > > kubuntu-de.org also used SC from then on in our news articles.
> > 
> > And no doubt followed what we were doing upstream using SC in the
> > announcement
> > titles...
> > 
> > Taking your 4.5 announcement, I reckon these are ok:
> > 
> > Kubuntu packages available for KDE's 4.5 releases
> > Plasma Workspaces and KDE Applications 4.5 packaged for Kubuntu
> > 
> > (I don't think you need to mention the Platform - do most of your readers
> > care?)
> > 
> > Or you could stick with your current formulation of referring to SC. It's
> > technically correct and doesn't bother me particularly as long as the
> > text explains that there are packages for the Plasma Workspaces,
> > Applications and
> > (if you like) Platform. I guess most Kubuntu users go mostly for KDE
> > software
> > anyway, so the everything together (SC) formulation is ok for them. What
> > would
> > be nice would be to get Ubuntu (i.e. GNOME focussed) press reporting the
> > release of KDE Applications 4.5 - their users aren't going to care about
> > the
> > Plasma Desktop 4.5 but there are probably some KDE Applications they
> > could use: Marble for example.
> > 
> > Stu
> > 
> >> What would be nice would be to get Ubuntu (i.e. GNOME focussed) press
> 
> reporting the
> 
> >> release of KDE Applications 4.5
> 
> KDE Apps can be used on Windows. So I have sent an email to Microsoft and
> they are considering our idea of posting KDE-news on their website. ;-)

KDE apps for Windows being covered in Windows-centric computer magazines? I 
want to see that happening when the Windows ports are more mature.
 
> Could we start releasing Plasma + Applications AND Platform seperated? That
> way the workload is more spread and we are in the news every 2,5 month ;-)

We could, yes. But I think the consensus is that the benefits are outweighed by 
the costs, for the moment at least.

(Yes, I know you were just taking the piss, but if you replace 'Microsoft' 
with $windowsmag then I don't actually find the suggestions silly)

Stu
 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.