Re: Do we release SC or not?
Stuart Jarvis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <201009021324.29395.stuart.jarvis__8838.48626767776$1283430305$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
On Thursday 02 September 2010 13:06:15 Bart Otten wrote: > 2010/9/2 Stuart Jarvis <[email protected]> > > > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 22:35:01 Arthur Schiwon wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > On Tuesday 31 August 2010 20:27:59 Troy Unrau wrote: > > > > Hi, it's Troy here, aka the branding police... > > > > > > > > SC was never intended to be an externally marketed term. It was > > > > supposed to be something we can use to refer to the 'bunch of stuff > > > > that has in common this release engineering artifact where they > > > > happen to be simultaneously released'. What happened was that people > > > > simply read this as 'where-ever you see KDE, write KDE SC' - failure > > > > on our part. > > > > > > Please correct me, but the paragraph "The KDE Software Compilation" in > > > > the > > > > > rebranding announcement > > > (http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand) said: > > > > > > »The KDE community does regular releases of a core set of KDE software > > > products. These releases are called the KDE Software Compilation and > > > > tagged > > > > > with a version number, e.g. "The KDE community is releasing KDE > > > Software Compilation 4.4". « > > > > Ok: > > - "core set of KDE software products" - i.e. more than one, in fact they > > were > > listed in the section above in the article > > - "these releases are called the KDE Software Compilation" - also true, > > if you > > need a word for the whole lot > > > > The original intention (clear from the original proposal and also in the > > meeting where we fleshed all this out - but, it seems, not from the > > article) > > was to emphasise the products. But we recognised there *are* times when a > > group term (SC) is needed. Unfortunately, we didn't follow through the > > logic > > with the 4.4 releases and used SC in our announcement titles - although > > the announcement text did emphasise the products. For the 4.5 release > > day, we did > > separate announcements for each product group. For 4.5.1 we reverted > > (incorrectly) to the old formulation for the title. > > > > > To me it sounds like the term Software Compilation (or simply SC) > > > should > > > > be > > > > > used in announcements and it is also the reason why we at > > > kubuntu-de.org also used SC from then on in our news articles. > > > > And no doubt followed what we were doing upstream using SC in the > > announcement > > titles... > > > > Taking your 4.5 announcement, I reckon these are ok: > > > > Kubuntu packages available for KDE's 4.5 releases > > Plasma Workspaces and KDE Applications 4.5 packaged for Kubuntu > > > > (I don't think you need to mention the Platform - do most of your readers > > care?) > > > > Or you could stick with your current formulation of referring to SC. It's > > technically correct and doesn't bother me particularly as long as the > > text explains that there are packages for the Plasma Workspaces, > > Applications and > > (if you like) Platform. I guess most Kubuntu users go mostly for KDE > > software > > anyway, so the everything together (SC) formulation is ok for them. What > > would > > be nice would be to get Ubuntu (i.e. GNOME focussed) press reporting the > > release of KDE Applications 4.5 - their users aren't going to care about > > the > > Plasma Desktop 4.5 but there are probably some KDE Applications they > > could use: Marble for example. > > > > Stu > > > >> What would be nice would be to get Ubuntu (i.e. GNOME focussed) press > > reporting the > > >> release of KDE Applications 4.5 > > KDE Apps can be used on Windows. So I have sent an email to Microsoft and > they are considering our idea of posting KDE-news on their website. ;-) KDE apps for Windows being covered in Windows-centric computer magazines? I want to see that happening when the Windows ports are more mature. > Could we start releasing Plasma + Applications AND Platform seperated? That > way the workload is more spread and we are in the news every 2,5 month ;-) We could, yes. But I think the consensus is that the benefits are outweighed by the costs, for the moment at least. (Yes, I know you were just taking the piss, but if you replace 'Microsoft' with $windowsmag then I don't actually find the suggestions silly) Stu _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.