Re: Do we release SC or not?
Arthur Schiwon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 02 September 2010 12:59:38 Stuart Jarvis wrote: > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 22:35:01 Arthur Schiwon wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > On Tuesday 31 August 2010 20:27:59 Troy Unrau wrote: > > > Hi, it's Troy here, aka the branding police... > > > > > > SC was never intended to be an externally marketed term. It was > > > supposed to be something we can use to refer to the 'bunch of stuff > > > that has in common this release engineering artifact where they happen > > > to be simultaneously released'. What happened was that people simply > > > read this as 'where-ever you see KDE, write KDE SC' - failure on our > > > part. > > > > Please correct me, but the paragraph "The KDE Software Compilation" in > > the rebranding announcement > > (http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand) said: > > > > »The KDE community does regular releases of a core set of KDE software > > products. These releases are called the KDE Software Compilation and > > tagged with a version number, e.g. "The KDE community is releasing KDE > > Software Compilation 4.4". « > > Ok: > - "core set of KDE software products" - i.e. more than one, in fact they > were listed in the section above in the article > - "these releases are called the KDE Software Compilation" - also true, if > you need a word for the whole lot > > The original intention (clear from the original proposal and also in the > meeting where we fleshed all this out - but, it seems, not from the > article) was to emphasise the products. But we recognised there *are* > times when a group term (SC) is needed. Unfortunately, we didn't follow > through the logic with the 4.4 releases and used SC in our announcement > titles - although the announcement text did emphasise the products. For > the 4.5 release day, we did separate announcements for each product group. > For 4.5.1 we reverted (incorrectly) to the old formulation for the title. The thing is, not everyone out there is reading this mailing list or taking part in meetings. When you announce it eventually, the content should be clear and correct. A QA thing, I guess. Now it seems like a forth and back of using terms and causing confusion to outsiders, imho. > > To me it sounds like the term Software Compilation (or simply SC) should > > be used in announcements and it is also the reason why we at > > kubuntu-de.org also used SC from then on in our news articles. > > And no doubt followed what we were doing upstream using SC in the > announcement titles... > > Taking your 4.5 announcement, I reckon these are ok: Actually I meant the German community (thanks for that feedback anyway), example headline: - KDE SC 4.5 mit Kubuntu Paketen erschienen without mentioning Plasma Workspace ord KDE Applications. Of course, we're going to adjust this in future... Cheers Arthur > > Stu > > _______________________________________________ > This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. > > Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set > digest on or temporarily stop your subscription. _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkyCLa0ACgkQdyQthyNG895iDwCgjz37he9Ej1RiUFjHhKm09N7r VmAAnicU1HQcISC7Sqxp8zcNO19K3kW9 =Ic/G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----