Re: Do we release SC or not?

Stuart Jarvis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <201009041356.12858.stuart.jarvis__14664.3550754108$1283605033$gmane$org@gmail.com>
On Saturday 04 September 2010 12:29:49 Arthur Schiwon wrote:
> On Thursday 02 September 2010 12:59:38 Stuart Jarvis wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 22:35:01 Arthur Schiwon wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday 31 August 2010 20:27:59 Troy Unrau wrote:
> > > > Hi, it's Troy here, aka the branding police...
> > > > 
> > > > SC was never intended to be an externally marketed term. It was
> > > > supposed to be something we can use to refer to the 'bunch of stuff
> > > > that has in common this release engineering artifact where they
> > > > happen to be simultaneously released'. What happened was that people
> > > > simply read this as 'where-ever you see KDE, write KDE SC' - failure
> > > > on our part.
> > > 
> > > Please correct me, but the paragraph "The KDE Software Compilation" in
> > > the rebranding announcement
> > > (http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand) said:
> > > 
> > > »The KDE community does regular releases of a core set of KDE software
> > > products. These releases are called the KDE Software Compilation and
> > > tagged with a version number, e.g. "The KDE community is releasing KDE
> > > Software Compilation 4.4". «
> > 
> > Ok:
> > - "core set of KDE software products" - i.e. more than one, in fact they
> > were listed in the section above in the article
> > - "these releases are called the KDE Software Compilation" - also true,
> > if you need a word for the whole lot
> > 
> > The original intention (clear from the original proposal and also in the
> > meeting where we fleshed all this out - but, it seems, not from the
> > article) was to emphasise the products. But we recognised there *are*
> > times when a group term (SC) is needed. Unfortunately, we didn't follow
> > through the logic with the 4.4 releases and used SC in our announcement
> > titles - although the announcement text did emphasise the products. For
> > the 4.5 release day, we did separate announcements for each product
> > group. For 4.5.1 we reverted (incorrectly) to the old formulation for
> > the title.
> 
> The thing is, not everyone out there is reading this mailing list or taking
> part in meetings.

Sure. Hence the dot article that listed the products and also introduced SC. 
Even looking back at that I don't understand the ambiguity, but of course I 
have a biased point of view as I know what we were trying to say. Clearly w 
didn't communicate it well enough.

> When you announce it eventually, the content should be
> clear and correct. A QA thing, I guess.

Yep

> > Taking your 4.5 announcement, I reckon these are ok:
> Actually I meant the German community (thanks for that feedback anyway),
> example headline:

Yeah, I did look at kubuntu-de :-) My suggestions were intended as 
alternatives to the below, but unfortunately my German isn't good enough to 
write them in German
> 
> - KDE SC 4.5 mit Kubuntu Paketen erschienen
> 
> without mentioning Plasma Workspace ord KDE Applications. Of course, we're
> going to adjust this in future...

Cool

Cheers,
Stu
 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.