Re: Do we release SC or not?
Stuart Jarvis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <201009041356.12858.stuart.jarvis__14664.3550754108$1283605033$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
On Saturday 04 September 2010 12:29:49 Arthur Schiwon wrote: > On Thursday 02 September 2010 12:59:38 Stuart Jarvis wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 September 2010 22:35:01 Arthur Schiwon wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > On Tuesday 31 August 2010 20:27:59 Troy Unrau wrote: > > > > Hi, it's Troy here, aka the branding police... > > > > > > > > SC was never intended to be an externally marketed term. It was > > > > supposed to be something we can use to refer to the 'bunch of stuff > > > > that has in common this release engineering artifact where they > > > > happen to be simultaneously released'. What happened was that people > > > > simply read this as 'where-ever you see KDE, write KDE SC' - failure > > > > on our part. > > > > > > Please correct me, but the paragraph "The KDE Software Compilation" in > > > the rebranding announcement > > > (http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/24/repositioning-kde-brand) said: > > > > > > »The KDE community does regular releases of a core set of KDE software > > > products. These releases are called the KDE Software Compilation and > > > tagged with a version number, e.g. "The KDE community is releasing KDE > > > Software Compilation 4.4". « > > > > Ok: > > - "core set of KDE software products" - i.e. more than one, in fact they > > were listed in the section above in the article > > - "these releases are called the KDE Software Compilation" - also true, > > if you need a word for the whole lot > > > > The original intention (clear from the original proposal and also in the > > meeting where we fleshed all this out - but, it seems, not from the > > article) was to emphasise the products. But we recognised there *are* > > times when a group term (SC) is needed. Unfortunately, we didn't follow > > through the logic with the 4.4 releases and used SC in our announcement > > titles - although the announcement text did emphasise the products. For > > the 4.5 release day, we did separate announcements for each product > > group. For 4.5.1 we reverted (incorrectly) to the old formulation for > > the title. > > The thing is, not everyone out there is reading this mailing list or taking > part in meetings. Sure. Hence the dot article that listed the products and also introduced SC. Even looking back at that I don't understand the ambiguity, but of course I have a biased point of view as I know what we were trying to say. Clearly w didn't communicate it well enough. > When you announce it eventually, the content should be > clear and correct. A QA thing, I guess. Yep > > Taking your 4.5 announcement, I reckon these are ok: > Actually I meant the German community (thanks for that feedback anyway), > example headline: Yeah, I did look at kubuntu-de :-) My suggestions were intended as alternatives to the below, but unfortunately my German isn't good enough to write them in German > > - KDE SC 4.5 mit Kubuntu Paketen erschienen > > without mentioning Plasma Workspace ord KDE Applications. Of course, we're > going to adjust this in future... Cool Cheers, Stu _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.